The Case Against Square Foot Pricing
- Gage Jaeger

- Aug 20
- 4 min read

Why spray foam bids based on square footage are misleading, risky, and costing you money — and what to do instead.
The Square Foot Myth
At first glance, square foot pricing feels like common sense. It’s quick, familiar, and customers expect it.
But here's the truth: spray foam is not a square foot product. It never has been.
It’s a volumetric system.What you’re really selling is board feet — a measure of volume, not surface area.
When you quote per square foot, you’re skipping the most important part of the estimate: how much foam you’re actually installing.
Board Feet: The Real Language of Spray Foam
Let’s back up for a second.
One board foot (BF) is 1 ft × 1 ft × 1 inch thick.So if you spray:
1 inch of foam on 1,000 sqft = 1,000 BF
2 inches on the same area = 2,000 BF
Double the foam. Double the cost.
But if you're still quoting $1.85/sqft whether you're spraying 1", 2", or 3" — you're either:
Not making money, or
Playing games with your bid language
Neither is good.
Square Foot Pricing Is Costly in Real Life
Here’s how square foot pricing backfires in actual jobs:
1. It Hides the Real Scope of Work
A 2-inch job and a 3-inch job might look the same on paper, but you're spraying 50% more foam on the latter. If your bid doesn’t reflect that, your margins vanish.
2. It Ignores Geometry and Slope
A sloped roof is always larger than its footprint. That means:
2,000 sqft of floor = 2,000 sqft of foam.
2,000 sqft of steep gable roof = often 2,400+ sqft of actual spray area.
Quoting by footprint (instead of true surface area) underbids the job — and you eat the difference.
3. It Can’t Flex with Foam Type or Layering
Open-cell vs. closed-cell.One layer vs. two.Flash-and-batt vs. full fill.
These all affect your cost per board foot, but none of it shows up if you're using flat per-square-foot pricing.
The Math Doesn’t Lie
Let’s break this down with two real-world job scenarios — both covering 2,000 square feet:
Job Type | Foam Type | Thickness | Total Board Feet | Material Cost (approx.) |
Crawlspace | Closed-Cell | 1 inch | 2,000 BF | ~$2,000 (at $1.00/BF) |
Attic Roof Deck | Open-Cell | 5 inches | 10,000 BF | ~$3,500 (at $0.35/BF) |
Both jobs are the same size on paper — 2,000 sqft — but one requires five times as much foam.
Yet, we’ve seen bids where contractors quote both at something like $1.25 per square foot.
Let’s do the math:
Crawlspace at 1" thick: 2,000 sqft × $1.25 = $2,500 (fine)
Attic Roof at 5" thick: 2,000 sqft × $1.25 = $2,500 (disaster)
You’d lose money on the attic job before you even rolled the rig out.
Even though open-cell is cheaper per board foot, you're still spraying five times the volume, using more time, more labor, and more fuel — and you’ll go through a lot more sets.
If your estimate doesn’t reflect board feet, you have no idea what your actual cost is — and you’re just hoping your square foot price works out.
Hope is not a business plan.
Where Square Foot Pricing Gets Dangerous
Spray foam is permanent. If you underbid drywall, you can patch it.If you underbid foam, you can't take it back.
You end up:
Spraying thinner than spec to save money
Eating huge overages to do it right
Damaging your reputation (or worse — getting sued)
And if the client wants documentation or proof later? A square foot quote doesn’t protect you.
The Liability Trap (Yes, Really)
Many contractors don’t realize how square foot pricing opens them up to legal and insurance risk.
Misrepresentation of scope: If the customer expected 3" but your quote didn’t define thickness, you’re exposed.
Change orders are vague: If you bid by sqft and the scope changes from 2" to 3", it’s hard to define the extra cost — especially if you didn’t calculate board feet in the first place.
Warranties and energy credits: Many rebates, tax credits, and code requirements are based on R-value or thickness. If your pricing isn’t based on the volume of foam, it may not comply.
Why Board Foot Pricing Fixes It All
Switching to board foot pricing (and quoting accordingly) gives you:
1. Full Transparency
Your customer sees exactly:
How thick the foam will be
How many board feet you're installing
What each component costs
That builds trust — and lets you walk away from jobs where the math doesn’t work.
2. Flexible Scope Management
Want to add an inch? No problem — recalculate the board feet, and update the cost. Everyone’s on the same page.
3. Built-In Waste and Buffers
Board foot estimates let you add:
Substrate loss
Environmental yield loss (hot or humid)
Setup waste
Spray overlap or return passes
So you’re not guessing — you’re covering your real costs.
4. Defensibility
If there’s ever a dispute, your bid is backed by math, not a round number. You can point to formulas, not feelings.
What You’ll Need to Bid This Way
Accurate structure measurements
Length × height × gables × roof slope
Foam thickness (by area)
Different areas = different thicknesses
Foam product data
Yield per set, density, ideal temp/RH, etc.
Material and labor costs
Per board foot, or per set
A system to track and calculate it
Paper, spreadsheet, or a tool like Foambid
Pro Tip: Use Software to Save Time (and Errors)
Let’s be real — doing all of this by hand is possible, but it’s also time-consuming and easy to screw up. That’s exactly why we built Foambid — so you could:
Enter real-world dimensions
Set thicknesses per structure area
Select foam products and yield
Get instant board foot totals
Price with real margins in mind
No guesswork. No surprises. No “how did we lose money on this job again?”
Final Word: You Don’t Spray Square Feet. You Spray Foam.

If you’re still quoting spray foam jobs by the square foot, you're not alone — but it's time to move on. The spray foam industry is too complex and too competitive to rely on outdated methods.
When you quote using board feet, you’re:
Speaking the actual language of foam
Protecting your margins
Educating your customer
And building a defensible, transparent business
It's not just better estimating — it’s better contracting.

by Gage Jaeger, Owner and Founder of Foambid



Comments